Critique of a Research Article Essay

This paper presents a critique of a soft look for oblige deedd Perceived sustenance from health c ar practitioners among adults with persona 2 diabetes (Oftedal et al, 2010) (appendix 1). To enable the critique of this article the Caldwell critiquing tool (2005) leave be utilized. (Appendix 2)Research critiquing is a valuable skill, to bring in as it enables learner nurses to develop and improve knowledge and skills and in addition adheres to the NMC code of conduct (NMC, 2008). Polit and Beck (2006) tension the ability to analyse look enables individuals to gain knowledge. A great magnificence of enquiry is that it introduces improvements and changes into answer based from evidence based physical exertion (EBP). fit in to Pioneer David Sacklett (2000). EBP stomach be defined as the integration of the trounce query evidence and clinical expertise, and patient values (Sacklett,2000). This article was selected as diabetes is becoming an international epidemic affecti ng all told health care professions (WHO,2012). starting point of interest to a reviewer is the title giving gather indication of the subject (Polit and beck, 2012). It should grab the attention of a subscriber as talk ofed by Parahoo (2006). A sober title should contemplate all aspects of the above, also considering Polit and Becks (2012) thoughts on the title organism with a 15 word limit. This title is very clear to the reader, in relation to the subject to a lower place fill being short, condensed and use of good wording.Appropriate selection for a research paper relies highly on validity and reliability, which give the sack be shown via credentials of authors. Working statues at bottom health studies and behavioural research indoors university of Stavanger clearly quoted against each of the authors. This article has clearly labelled, educational status and works status of all authors.Willis (2007) believes that an authors academic background hatful give validity a nd credibleness within the research itself. Education held by authors was MSc, PhD, RNT being of an university level (Oftedal et al, 2010).Further interest to a reader commences from the canvass shown within an abstract. This has to hold enough information for it to show a abbreviated on a lower floorstanding of the call for in place. Holloway and Wheeler (2010) recommend a clear, concise summary of the research and how it should be implemented. Burns and Grove (2007) mention good abstracts convey findings and capturing attention of a reader. A benefit to this article is that it is clear, decipherable and structured with subheadings providing a deeper structured understanding.The introduction of this article evidently outlines the precept for the study with reference of findings from other relevant studies completed. Holloway and Wheeler (2010) declare authors perplex to provide awareness of their subject and reasons for their study. Suggestions made indicated that it is do minant for study for the improvements to be made, emphasising on the rise in statistics from the condition (Oftedal et al, 2010). at heart the article, there is no clear indication of a writings look into. Although, through reading this it has suit unmistakable that it has been included within the background section. Polit and Beck (2012) discuss a literature review being a summary of previous research. Explanations are disposed within reference to other studies such as Schilling et al (2002) which has shown to lack empirical evidence.However, Thorne and Paterson (2001) look at aspects, but indicate to a greater extent(prenominal) research can be done. The purpose of a literature review is essential as it gives to a greater extent emphasis on why the study is important for instance lack of previous research on the subject. Within this article has an disadvantage, be own there is no clear stating of a literature review, which would in some circumstances confuse a reader. Rese arch cite within the article was amongst the years 1992-2008 mentioning the need for further research (Oftedal et al, 2010).A purpose for an article is to generalise there aims, informing subject under study stating what is likely to be achievable from the study Polit and beck (2012) emphasis this being an importance. The aim is clearly sub headed giving the reader clear office within the report, it is short and concise with relevant information indicating the subject of study and what is desired. The aim being perceived raise from healthcare and different attributes, that capture peoples self-charge of the disease (Oftedal et al, 2010).The study is complete by exploitation participants. Ethical issues have a vast importance relating to the validity and credibility of the research. Approval of ethical committees is exceptional, including reference. Legal rights and ethical aspects for all research methods have to be considered (Holloway and Wheeler, 2002 Moule 2011 Strubert, 2 011). The study appears to have been approved by Norwegian regional committee for medical and health research ethics, affable science info services all having reference provided.Implications can be studied at length but four rights are paramount in research the right not to be harmed, the right of near disclosure, the right to self-determination and the right to privacy, anonymity and confidentiality (ICN, 2012). It is apparent from the study that inform consent was gained from participants, as an invitation was sent, and approval from participants was gained. The right to withdraw was shown as both participants never contributed from initial approval.Methodology is discussed by Parahoo (2007) simply as a plan that describes, how, when and where data is to be collected and analysed. This article does not visibly show methodology but it is an interchangeable term such as research design is present. An advantage from the article is that further reading and erudition is not neces sary as it obviously indicates this research as instructive and descriptive qualitative design (Oftedal et al, 2010). Holloway and Wheeler (2002) state it gives an understanding of gracious experiences, giving an advantage to this research as it is what they wish to gain.Additionally, Holloway and Wheeler (2010) discuss, how root with philology and the human science, especially in history, centring the way humans associate to their subjective reality and attaching a meaningto it. Approach put one acrossn entirely on world life context rather than individuality allowing more of an understanding of human experiences at a whole. This lineament of research allows authors to gain characteristics within this field. Usage of the data is to develop theories and identify problems with current pull (Burns and Grove, 2007 Gerrish and Lacey, 2010).Outcomes achieved five themes, namely an empathetic approach, practical advice and information, involvement in conclusion devising, accurat e and individualised information and on-going based support (Oftedal et al, 2010). These are gained via instructive and descriptive qualitative design, as it focusses more natural environments rather than cause and effect which is quasi-experimental. This concept being noticeably identified via the research, this was conducted.Details of the participants can be found within the article visibly labelled participants. A participant enables the researcher to conduct the study Burns and Grove (2012) apprize participants are selected due to experience, knowledge and views related to the study in the impart aiding the researcher to gain accurate information. Within this article, the type of taste which has been declare is purposive s adenylic acidling Parahoo (2006) suggests that this type of s adenosine monophosphateling conducted is chosen because it provides more veritable and valid data as it is represented by participants diagnosed with the condition. Furthermore the participan ts, who were invited to relieve oneself part, were recruited via referrals, from local organisations relating to diabetes such as learning and coping. Ability to speak Norwegian and be within an age bracket of 30-65 allows the data to be more accurate.As discussed, sampling was purposeful therefore it emphasises the reliability. The model size apply for this research was 19 participants recruited from 3 organisations, unemployed to reduce bias. Mixed gender, cured 30-65 and all participants had the condition for a minimum of one year. Although, purposive sampling is used it does not indicate which strategy for instance, Patton (2002) allocates more than 12 for qualitative research, Polit and Beck (2012) note there being no fixed rules for sample size, although international Morse code (2000) mentions how much broad the scope, reflects in the sample size. This research has an advantage as it focussed on participants whom are diabetic. However limitations being restricted are age group, and metabolic generalisation. For example participants within the study all had the controlled blood line glucose levels, there was no sample members who shown uncontrolled or unstable diabetes. entropy collection from the research conducted was presented within a table. Collected via focus groups, consisting of 6-7 soul per session, participants were interviewed at the workplace of the authors and mixture of genders per group. Although as mentioned by Polit and Hungler (1997) advantage being that it increases dialogue disadvantage being an decrease for those not comfortable voice within a group. As it has it pros and cons we can establish that all participants had type 2 disease therefore would not have much cultivate on responses.Limits of time, and for 2 sessions was placed by researchers. The authors recommended time for reflection between sessions. The models used, were identified with the data collection section being expectancy-value and tender support theory for q uestions within the focus groups. All the participants spoke one language Norwegian which is an advantage to others as it is easier to transcribe.The focus groups explained in data abstract was audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, creating auditability. The summary was as stated Qualitative content analysis in breast feeding research Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness (Graneheim and Lundman, 2004 Oftedal et al, 2010, p1503). Processes took place for this study, unusually shown as coding to breakdown text into parts identifying patterns within the data (Burns and Grove, 2006 Holland and Rees, 2010). After identifying codes, this enables the themes to be developed which was interrelated as findings of the study. Furthermore, data management requires clear processes to ensure methodological rigour and credibility of the findings (Burns and Grove, 2007). According to Polit and Beck (2006) a reader should consider if the data is adequate, to be published in a clear and efficient manner. This article has appropriately labelled correctly making it readable and understandable.The results gained from the data analysis, is clearly drawn within the article under the findings section providing the established themes, creating an understanding for the reader of how and why they found referenced themes. Polit and Beck (2013) discuss how a reader should notably find limitations within the study. this article presents a limitation section outlining a discussion of how it affects the results and further addresses feasible queries that can be made such as, different attributes that can be found from people without stable metabolic ranges as it was limited to acceptable metabolic levels (Oftedal et al, 2010). The impact of results found can construct towards EBP. Additionally, the authors have discussed implications for practice within the study. This advantage is a favourable point as it leads the reader of the implications and how it can be imple mented. It focuses hugely on how beneficial it is when it comes to practice.According to transferability of these findings it incurs apparent that type 2 diabetes is a worldwide increasing problem. Results can be transferrable to any country to improve better care for those with type 2 diabetes. The study was conduct in Norway, although it is based within some other country the prevalence is still applicable in the UK. Holloway and Wheeler (2010) discuss the meaning of transferability as findings of one context that can be transferred to quasi(prenominal) situations or participants diabetes is a worldwide known disease (WHO, 2012) it can be transferred.Polit and Beck (2013) reference that for the generalisation of the study it has to be valid and reliable for this to take place. The role of a nurse becomes paramount within this section. Whether the results can be implemented by a nurse in practice, such as supporting patients in a better manner and referring if needed for more ed ucation, giving more individualisation to self-management programmes as discussed within the article (Oftedal et al, 2010).In relation to the conclusion within the article it clearly sums up the findings and how it can be implemented within practice. It states that further research is necessary forward definite conclusions can be retained. Transferability of the research to other chronic illness similar to type 2 diabetes was also mentioned. Burns and Grove (2010) gestate that the findings and the meaning of the research should be placed within the conclusion.The assignment has explored the consequence within research and EBP, transferability of research and recommendation have an importance in this. Overall, this article was clear with good use of words, presentation was greatly achieved, allowing the reader to be more focussed. It discussed within itself the limitations, recommendations and the need for further research for this to become meaningful. Recommendations can be vie wed as knowledge and implemented within practice from this study. Also showing that evidence based practice does start from research it is shown that studies are required in some circumstances to gain more knowledge to improve services.ReferencesBurns, N, Grove, S K (2006) Understanding care for research expression an evidence based practice quaternate ed Elsevier Saunders, united States of AmericaBurns, N, Grove, S K (2007) Understanding nursing research Building an evidence-based practice. 5th ed. Elsevier Saunders, United States of AmericaCaldwell, K., Henshaw, L., and Taylor, G. (2005) Developing a frame-work for critiquing health research, ledger of health, social and envi-ronmental issues, 6(1), pp45-53. accessed via https//eprints.mdx.ac.uk/2981/1/Developing_a_framework_for_critiquing_health_research.pdf accessed 20/05/2013Cutcliffe, J. and Ward, M. (eds.) (2007) Critiquing nursing research. 2nd ed. London Quay Books.Gerrish, K and Lacey, a (2010) The reseach process in nursing 6th Ed Blackwell issue OxfordGraneheim, UH. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursingresearch Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, pp. 105-112. accessed via http//www.nurseeducationtoday.com/article/S0260-6917(03)00151-5/abstractaccessed 20/05/2013Holland, K. and Rees, C. (2010) Nursing evidence-based practice skills. tonic York Oxford University Press.Holloway, I, Wheeler, S (2002) qualitative research in nursing 2nd ed. Blackwell publishing OxfordHolloway, I, Wheeler, S (2010) qualitative research in nursing and healthcare tertiary ed. Blackwell publishing OxfordICN (international council of nurses) (2012) ethical guidelines for nursing research. Geneva ICN accessed via http//www.icn.ch/images/stories/documents/publications/free_publications/Code_of_Ethics_2012.pdf accessed 20/05/2013.Morse, Janice, M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 3-5. accessed via http//q hr.sagepub.com/content/10/1/3.extract accessed 20/05/2013Moule, P, Hek, J (2011) Making sense of reseach an introduction for health and social care practioners. 4th ed. salvia publications LondonNursing & Midwifery Council (2008) The code standards of conduct, execution and ethics for nurses and midwives. London Nursing and Midwifery Council.Oftedal, B, Karlsen, B, Bru E. (2010) Perceived support from healthcare practioners among adults with type 2 diabetes. Journal of advanced nursing, vol 66, issue 7, pp1500-1509. Blackwell publishing accessed via http//onlinelibrary.wiley.com/inside/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05329.x/abstract accessed on 01/03/2013Patton, M Q (2002) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, Sage Thousand Oaks.Parahoo, K. (eds.) (2006) Nursing research principles, process and issues. 2nd ed. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan.Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. (eds.) (2012) Nursing research generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia Lip pincott Williams and Wilkins.Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. (eds.) (2006) Essentials of nursing care methods, appraisal and utilization. 6th ed. Philadelphia Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. (eds.) (2010) Essentials of nursing research appraising evidence for nursing practice. 7th ed. Philadelphia Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. (eds.) (2013) Essentials of nursing research appraising evidence for nursing practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Polit,D F, Hungler, B P (1997) Essentials of nursing research methods, appraisal and utilization. 4th Ed, Lippincott- Raven, Philadelphia New YorkDavid L. Sackett (2000). Evidence based medical specialty how to practice and teach EBM. Volume 2 Edition, 2, Churchill Livingstone University of Michigan.Schilling L.S., Grey M. & Knafl K.A. (2002) The concept of selfmanagement of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents anevolutionary concept analysis. Journal of Advance d Nursing 37(1), 8799.accessed via .http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11784402 Accessed 20/05/2013Streubert, H J, Carpenter, D R (2011) Qualitative research in nursing advancing the humanistic unequivocal 5th Ed, Wolter Kluwer Lippincott Williams & WilliamsLondon. pp56-59Thorne S.E. & Paterson B.L. (2001) Health care professional support for self-care management in chronic illness insights from diabetes research. Patient Education and steering 42(1), 8190.Accessed via http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11080608 Accessed 20/05/2013WHO. (2012) About WHO online. World Health Organization. Available from http//www.who.int/ round/en/ Accessed 17th December 2012.Willis, J, W. (2007) Foundations of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, California Sage.