Deontological ethics and teleological (utilitarian) ethics Essay

Deontological ethics and teleological (utilitarian) ethics - turn out ExampleAn act undertaken with negative intentions is therefore, under deontology, immoral irrespective of its beneficial consequences. The two theories therefore discord in the principles that while utilitarianism is based on consequences of actions, deontology is based on responsibility and motives into actions (Mann and Roberts, 2012 Ahronheim, Moreno and Zuckerman, 2005).Both deontology and teleology have inhering problems. Teleology undermines justice as it can promote an unlawful work as long as the practice results in more benefits than harm. It is also difficult to quantify consequences of actions. Deontology is however rigid and may lead to catastrophic actions. Similarly, deontologys observance of rules may lead to confusion especially when values or assumptions conflict (Mann and Roberts, 2012, p. 16).teleological ethics that requires attention to consequences is therefore a problem because it may in duce conflict with legal comestible since a beneficial consequence may be achieved through illegal means. This means that the theory undermines justice. companionable dynamism also means that long term consequences of present actions on future actions cannot be predicted, a matter that further undermines utilitarianism (Mann and Roberts, 2012, p.